State Studies of Contemporary Iran

State Studies of Contemporary Iran

Analyzing the content of leadership statements in the field of relations between governments and the West, emphasizing the nuclear policy of the 11th government

Document Type : Iran's foreign policy

Authors
Hosein Mohammadi Sirat 1
seyed jalal taheri 2
1 science of politics faculty, imam sadiq university, tehran, iran
2 science of politics faculty , imam sadiq university, tehran, iran
10.47176/irsj.2025.1212
Abstract
after the Islamic Revolution, Iran's international interactions, especially in relation to the United States of America, faced many challenges. One of the most important challenges was the economic sanctions of the United States, which had a deep impact on Iran's oil economy. These sanctions, which started in the 1980s and expanded during the following decades, practically became one of the fundamental challenges for Iran's economy and foreign policy. During these years, each of the governments followed a specific approach towards the West according to their own conditions and slogans. The government of "Tadbir and Omid" negotiated the nuclear issue with the slogan of lifting the economic sanctions of the West. For this purpose, the 11th government has a special position; Because it is the only government in the Islamic Republic that has based its governance on foreign policy. The supreme leader of the revolution, considering the special position they have in the constitution and determining the general policies of the system; They have made important statements regarding the nuclear negotiations during the years of negotiations and after that. Using the method of content analysis, His Holiness' statements were coded and verified. In the first stage, 67 basic themes were extracted from the statements. In the next stages, 17 organizing themes and 4 overarching themes with the themes "we have no trust with America", "negotiation must be revolutionary", "the negotiations of the 11th government failed" and "negotiations with America will not lead to a retreat from the principles" and categorized.
Keywords
supreme Revolutionary leader
negotiation
America
JCPOA
11th government
enmity
Subjects

Smiley face

  • - •   Holy Quran

    • The Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran (1989)
    • Charter of the United Nations (1945)
    • Bazargan, Abbas (2010). An introduction to qualitative and mixed research methods; Common Approaches in Behavioral Sciences, Tehran: Didar Publishing
    • Dehghani Firouzabadi Seyed Jalal; And Rohi Mahdi. (2018). The ratio of anti-arrogance with peace and negotiation in the foreign policy sources of J.A.A. Political thought in Islam, 4(15).
    • bahoosh fardaghi, mahdi. (2023). Islamic Republic of Iran (anti-arrogance, fight against dominance, support of the oppressed). State Studies of Contemporary Iran, 9(2), 119-147.
    • Boyatzis, R. E. (1998), Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development, Sage Braun
    • Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006), “Using thematic analysis in psychology”, Qualitative Research in Psychology, Vol. 3, No. 2, Pp. 77-101
    • Hadipour, Maitham, & Zarundi, Mehdi. (1403). Explaining the role of the Supreme Leader (Madazala Al-Aali) in promoting dynamic defense diplomacy. Contemporary Iranian government research, 10(1), 165-196.
    • Hassan Abedi Jafari; Mohammad Saeed Taslimi; Abolhasan Faqihi; and Mohammad Sheikhzadeh. (Beta). Theme analysis and theme network: a simple and efficient way to explain patterns in qualitative data. Imam Sadiq University, 5(2), 151-198.
    • Hasan Shamsini Ghiathund (last name); and Reza Nasiri. (2015). The Supreme Leader's approach to the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran with an emphasis on the negotiation method and the meaning of heroic gentleness. Journal of Faculty of Law and Political Science, (1), 22-3.
    • Holloway, I. & Todres, L. (2003), “The Status of Method: Flexibility, Consistency and Coherence”, Qualitative Research, Vol. 3, No. 3, Pp. 345-357.
    • Khenifar, Hossein; Muslimi, Nahid; and Yazdani, Hamidreza. (2016). The principles and basics of qualitative research methods (volume 1) (volume 1). The look of knowledge.
    • Khosronjad Mozhgan; And Shahbazi of peace. (2020). Commitment to negotiate in the peaceful settlement of international disputes. Public Law Studies (Law) , 50(1).
    • Masoud Kia. (2022). Analyzing the prospect of relations between Iran and Germany in the 21st century. International Relations Research Quarterly, 12(2)
    • Mehrabani, Qorban Ali; and Zargran Khozani, Fatima. (2022). Analyzing the jihad of explanation: a research based on thematic analysis in the statements of the Supreme Leader (Madazlah al-Aali). National Defense Strategic Management Studies, 24(6), 383-414.
    • Mohammad Babazadeh. (2018). Iraq's imposed war against Iran and the positions of countries and the international community from the perspective of international relations. The article presented in the National Conference of New and Creative Ideas. Tehran: Azad University.
    • Mohammadi, Buik (2008). An Introduction to Qualitative Research Method. Tehran: Research Institute of Humanities and Cultural Information
    • pooraskary، hossein؛ و behestani، majid ‌. (۲۰۲۴) ‏. The scope of the principle of expediency in the establishment of military relations between the Islamic Republic and the war infidels from the point of view of contemporary Shiite jurists with an emphasis on the jurisprudential opinions of Imam Khome ‌. State Studies of Contemporary Iran، 9(4)، 147-172.
    • Rezaei, Shaaban; Momeni, Abedin; and Faqihi, Ali. (2022). The necessity of legitimacy in the religious authority. Iranian Political Sociology Monthly, (12), 3053-3067
    • Ruhollah Shariati. (2008). Rules of political jurisprudence. Qom: Research Institute of Islamic Sciences and Education.
State Studies of Contemporary Iran
Volume 11, Issue 1
Spring 2025
Pages 83-107

  • Receive Date 13 May 2024
  • Revise Date 16 June 2024
  • Accept Date 02 October 2024
  • Publish Date 21 April 2025