تاثیر فرهنگ سیاسی تبعی بر روند دموکراسی در دولت نهم و دهم

نوع مقاله : جامعه شناسی سیاسی ایران

نویسنده

گروه معارف اسلامی و دروس عمومی دانشگاه هنر اصفهان

چکیده

هر چند افزایش درآمدهای ارزی ناشی از بالا رفتن قیمت نفت در بازارهای جهانی، توان این دولت در انجام اقداماتی چون پرداخت یارانه نقدی،توزیع سهام عدالت و اجرای پروژه مسکن مهر را بالا برد،اما ناخواسته به اقتدارگرائی دولت که اینک خود را ولی نعمت مردم می‌دید،دامن زد تا جائی که ثروت بیش از حد نفتی، ضرورت پاسخگو بودن در برابر گروه های پرسشگر را تحت الشعاع خود قرار داد و در نتیجه با رواج فرهنگ سیاسی تبعی، دولت خود را از مشروعیت دموکراتیک بی‌نیاز دید.
"بهره‌مندی از درآمدهای نفتی پشتوانه طرح آرمان‌های عامه‌پسند که با تقویت ماهیت رانتیر دولت، وابستگی اقشار ضعیف و متوسط جامعه به دولت  را افزایش داد، پاسخگوئی دولت در برابر مردم که از لوازم تحقق دموکراسی در هر جامعه‌ای است را کاهش داد"، فرضیه این نوشتار در پاسخ به سوال اصلی چرائی به محاق رفتن دموکراسی در دولت مدعی مردمسالاری، را تشکیل می‌دهد. یافته‌های حاصل از پژوهش حاضر که با استفاده از روش توصیفی-تحلیلی انجام گرفته است، نشان می‌دهد عدم توزیع عادلانه ثروت حاصل از درآمدهای نفتی در دولت بهار و در نتیجه مواجهه مردم با اَشکال جدیدِ «سرمایه‌داری رفاقتی» بازتولید شده توسط قدرت‌های سیاسی ثروت‌محور، ضمن کاهش ضرورت پاسخگوئی دولت در برابر شهروندان ، با سلب امکان تبدیل ایرانیان به فاعلی شناسا و سوژه وتداوم بقاء آنان در حالت ابژه و سوژه‌ منقاد،فصل خزان دموکراسی در دوران حاکمیت دولت بهار رقم خورد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The influence of subordinate political culture on the process of democracy in the 9th and 10th governments

نویسنده [English]

  • Mojtaba Attarzadeh
Isfahan University of Art
چکیده [English]

Although the increase in foreign currency income due to the increase in the price of oil in the world markets has increased the ability of this government to carry out measures such as paying cash subsidies, distributing equity shares and implementing the Mehr housing project, but it has inadvertently led to the authoritarianism of the government, which now considers itself the guardian of the people. He saw it, until the excessive oil wealth overshadowed the need to be accountable to questioning groups, and as a result, with the spread of the subordinate political culture, the government found itself without the need for democratic legitimacy.
"Benefiting from oil revenues is the support of the plan of popular ideals which, by strengthening the rentier nature of the government, increased the dependence of the weak and middle classes of the society on the government, and reduced the accountability of the government to the people, which is one of the essentials for the realization of democracy in any society", the hypothesis of this article. In response to the main question, why should democracy be included in the government claiming to be democratic? The findings of the current research, which has been conducted using descriptive-analytical methods, show the lack of fair distribution of wealth from oil revenues in the Bahar government, and as a result, people face new forms of "crony capitalism" reproduced by wealth-oriented political powers, while Decreasing the necessity of the government's accountability to the citizens, by denying the possibility of turning Iranians into knowing agents and subjects and continuing to remain in the state of objects and subjects of criticism, the autumn season of democracy took place during the rule of the Spring government

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • oil revenues
  • democracy
  • justice
  • subordinate political culture

Smiley face

1. Abtahi, Mostafa, Heidari, Nusratullah (2013) "Study of the relationship between oil and political underdevelopment in Iran". Quarterly Journal of Political Studies. Volume 5. Number 19. Spring. Pp. 44-25. [In Persian]
2. Akhavan Kazemi, Bahram (2009). "The Discourse of Justice in the Ninth Government". Quarterly Journal of Political Knowledge. 2. Autumn and winter. Pp. 243-195. [In Persian]
3. Almond, Gabriel; A., Powell, Bingham and Monte, Robert J. (2002) A theoretical framework for the study of comparative politics. Translated by Alireza Tayeb. Tehran: Public Management Training Center. [In Persian]
4. Aristotle (1970) Politics. Translated by Hamid Enayat. Tehran: Pocket Books Company. [In Persian]
5. Alvani, Mehdi et al. (2012) "Designing a model for improving the level of social capital of citizens in the era of globalization". Quarterly Journal of Strategic Studies of Public Policy. No. 6. Spring. [In Persian]
6. Amin Rashti, Narcissus (2013) "The Role of Social Security System on Human Development in Iran". Quarterly Journal of Financial Economics. No. 23. Spring. Pp. 110-81. [In Persian]
7. Ansari, Mansour (2005) Democracy ‌ Dialogue; Tehran: Markaz Publishing . [In Persian]
8. Azghandi, Alireza (2015) Introduction to Iranian Political Sociology. Tehran: Qoumes Publishing. [In Persian]
9. Bachrach, Peter (1975) Interest, Participation and Democratic Theory. In: Pennock,R. & Chapman, J. (eds)Nomos XVI, Participation in Politics. New York, Lieber- Atherrto
10. Badie, Bertran (2000) Political Development. Translated by Ahmad Naqibzadeh, Tehran: Qoumes. [In Persian]
11. Barber, Benjamin (2003), Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics of A New Age, University of California Press.
12. Bayat, Abdolrasoul (2002) Vocabulary: An Introduction to Contemporary Schools and Thoughts. Qom: Institute of Religious Thought and Culture. [In Persian]
13. Bobio, Norberto (1997) Liberalism and Democracy. Translated by Babak Golestan. Tehran: Cheshmeh Publishing. [In Persian]
14. Charles,Taylor (1996), Source of the Self: The Makng of the Modern Identity, Cambridge, Harward University Press.
15. Charles,Taylor (1998), " The Dinamics of Democratic Exclusion", Journal of Democracy, Vol.9, No. 4.
16. Frridman ,Thomas l.(2006).”The First Law of  Petropolitics”. Foreign Policy Magazine. October16
17. Elahi Manesh, Mohammad Hassan (2005). The Impact of Elite Political Culture on the National Identity of the Islamic Republic of Iran during 1357-1387. PhD Thesis, Political Science, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch. [In Persian]
18. Gadamer, Hans Georg,(2003) Truth and Method, Translation by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall, London: Continuum Publishing Group,Third edition.
19. Gholamrezakashi, Mohammad Javad (2000). The magic of speech, cultural mentality and the system of meanings in Dom Khordad. Tehran: Ainde Pajohan Cultural Institute. [In Persian]
20. Gil, Grimm (2015) Democratization Dynamics; Elites, civil society and the transition process. Tehran: Akhtaran Publishing
21. Green, Judith (1999), Deep Dmocracy: Diversity, Community and Trasformation, Rowman.
22. Haji Yousefi, Amir Mohammad (1998) "Relative independence of government or civil society in the Islamic Republic of Iran". Quarterly Journal of Strategic Studies. Issue 2. Winter. Pp. 69-94. [In Persian]
23. Haji Yousefi, Amir Mohammad (2008) "Government, Oil and Economic Development in Iran". Tehran: Islamic Revolution Documentation Center. [In Persian]
24. Held, Devid (2007) Models of Democracy, Polity Press.
25. Hesam Ghazi, Rojan (2015) "Pathology of populist justice discourse and its reflection in Iranian political culture". Quarterly Journal of Political Studies. Seventh Year, No. 28. Summer. Pp. 150-133. [In Persian]
26. Kasraei, Mohammad Salar (2009). "Laclau and Mouffe's theory of discourse is an effective tool in understanding and explaining political phenomena." Quarterly Journal of Politics. Issue 3. Autumn. Pp. 390-339. [In Persian]
27. Keegan, Christopher W.(2005), Defending Deep democracy, New York, University of New York Press
28. Keyhan Newspaper  10th.June 2005
29. Linz, Juan J. & Stephan, Alfred (1996)”Toward Consolidation Democracies”; Jurnal of democracy. Vol. 7,No.2.
30. Luciani, Giacomo (2001) Oil Rents and the Financial Crisis of Government and Democracy in the Middle East. In Democracy and Civil Society, the Middle East Translated by Mohammad Taghi Delfrooz, Tehran: Salam Newspaper Publications. [In Persian]
31. Marsh, David and Stoker, Jerry (2005) Methods and Theory in Political Science. Translated by Amir Mohammad Haji Yousefi. Tehran: Research Institute for Strategic Studies. [In Persian]
32. McDonald, Dayan (2001) An Introduction to Discourse Theories. Translated by Hossein Ali Norouzi. Tehran: Culture of Discourse
33. Mohammadian et al. (2021) in the article "Rethinking the concept of political development in the fundamentalist discourse of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad". Iranian Political Research Quarterly. Volume 8, Number 27. April. pp. 123-140. [In Persian]
34. Molavi, Zeinab et al. (2009) "Bureaucracy and perception of national resilience". Quarterly Journal of Management of Government Organizations. Volume 7. Number 2. Spring. Pp. 96-83. [In Persian]
35. Ottawa, Marina (2007) Transition to Democracy or Pseudo-Authoritarianism. Translator: Saeed Mirtorabi, Tehran: Qoumes Publishing. [In Persian]
36. Pai et al. (2001) Crises and Sequences in Political Development. Translated by Gholamreza Khajehsaravi. Tehran: Research Institute for Strategic Studies. [In Persian]
37. Purcell, M. (2016). For democracy: planning and publics without the state. Planning Theory, 15(4), 386-401
38. Planatz, John (2011) Ideology. Translated by Ezatullah Fooladvand. Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publishing Company. [In Persian]
39. Popper, Carl Raymond (1999) "An idea about the theory and function of democratic government". Translated by Kourosh Zaeem. Political-Economic Information Monthly. No. 141-142. . [In Persian]
40. Raghfar, Hossein (2013) "Kinship capitalism and refusal to develop". Sura Andisheh. Number fourteen. . [In Persian]
41. Ross, Michael(2001) "Does Oil Hinder Democracy?" World Politics, No. 5
42. Rostampour and colleague (2021) "The ratio of centralism and good governance in the 9th and 10th governments". Islamic World Political Research Quarterly. Volume 11, Number 1. Spring. pp. 139-161. [In Persian]
43. Saree-ul-Qalam, Mahmoud (2011) Iranian authoritarianism during the Qajar era, Tehran: Farzanroz publishing house. [In Persian]
44. Sarzayem, Ali (2017) "Iranian Populism". Tehran: Rhino Publishing. [In Persian]
45. Shadivand, Qader (2015) "Oil Revenues and the Government (Presenting a Proposed Model)". Issue 122. . [In Persian]
46. Sharafi, Mahmoud (2010) "Study and Critique of Ethics in Martin Buber's Thought". Quarterly Journal of New Educational Thoughts. Volume 6. No. 2 .Summer .Pp. 52-9. [In Persian]
47. Soltani, Ali Asghar (2004) "Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method". Quarterly Journal of Political Science. Issue 28. Winter. Pp. 64-48. [In Persian]
48. Soltani, Alireza (2012) "Oil and the process of government - nation building in Iran". Quarterly Journal of Politics. Issue 2. Summer. Pp. 112-95. [In Persian]
49. Smith, Alfred. (2021). “Democracy vs. Demography: Rethinking Politics and the People as Debate”, Thesis Eleven, 164 (1): 88- 103.
50. Tajik, Mohammad Reza (2018) "21 years after the 2nd of Khordad". Shargh newspaper. 2 Khordad. [In Persian]
51. Tajik, Mohammad Reza (2003) The experience of political play among Iranians. Tehran: Ney Publishing. [In Persian]
52. Towheed Pham et al. (2022) "Inspection of indicators of good governance (rule of law and accountability) in Iran during the years 2005-2021". Islamic Revolution Approach Quarterly. Number 57. Winter. pp. 61-84. [In Persian]
53. Travel, Sayed Amir (2005). The actors of the third of July. Tehran: Tomorrow Designers. [In Persian]
54. Young, Iris M. (2000), Inclusion and Democracy, New York, Oxford University Press.
55. Zakaria, Farid (2006) "The Future of Freedom: The Priority of Liberalism over Democracy". Translated by Amir Hossein Norouzi, Tehran: New Design. [In Persian]
56. Zaire Kaaba, et al. (2016) "Analysis of Sociological Backgrounds of the Evolution of Justice Discourses in Khatami, Ahmadinejad and Rouhani Governments". Journal of Economic Sociology and Development. Volume 8. Issue 2. Autumn and Winter. Pp. 149-127. [In Persian]