کاربست نظریه دولت کارآفرین با تاکید بر مسائل ایران

نوع مقاله : سیاست گذاری و حکمرانی سیاسی

نویسنده

گروه مدیریت، دانشکده علوم‌انسانی آزادشهر، دانشگاه گنبدکاووس، گنبدکاووس، ایران.

چکیده

تحقیق حاضر به بررسی و تحلیل کاربست نظریه "دولت کارآفرین" در ایران پرداخته است. هدف اصلی پژوهش، شناسایی چالش‌ها و فرصت‌های موجود برای اجرای این نظریه در سیاست‌گذاری‌های دولتی کشور است که با استفاده از روش تحقیق کیفی و تحلیل محتوای اسناد و پژوهش‌های پیشین، به بررسی وضعیت کنونی دولت کارآفرین در ایران و مقایسه آن با تجربیات موفق کشورهای دیگر پرداخته است. گردآوری داده‌ها از طریق مطالعات کتابخانه‌ای، تحلیل اسناد و گزارش‌ها، و بررسی تجربیات بین‌المللی انجام شد و از روش تحلیل محتوا برای تحلیل داده‌ها استفاده شد. یافته‌ها نشان داد که دولت کارآفرین به‌عنوان یک مدل نوین در مدیریت دولتی، نقش فعالی در توسعه اقتصادی و حمایت از نوآوری‌ها دارد. برخلاف رویکردهای سنتی که دولت را تنها به‌عنوان نهاد نظارتی و تنظیم‌گر می‌شناسند، این نظریه دولت را به‌عنوان تسهیل‌گر و مجری نوآوری‌ها و پروژه‌های اقتصادی می‌داند. بررسی تجربیات سایر کشورها نیز نشان می‌دهد که پذیرش اصول دولت کارآفرین در سیاست‌گذاری‌ها می‌تواند به بهبود کارایی دولت‌ها و افزایش رقابت‌پذیری اقتصادی کمک کند. در ایران نیز، اگرچه چالش‌هایی نظیر بوروکراسی پیچیده، تمرکزگرایی، و مقاومت فرهنگی در برابر تغییر وجود دارد، پذیرش این مدل می‌تواند به بهبود عملکرد نهادهای دولتی کمک کند. اصلاح ساختارهای بوروکراتیک، تمرکززدایی از تصمیم‌گیری‌ها، تغییر فرهنگ سازمانی به‌گونه‌ای که نوآوری و ریسک‌پذیری در بخش دولتی تشویق شود، و ایجاد نظام‌های انگیزشی برای کارکنان و مدیران دولتی از جمله راهکارهای پیشنهادی هستند. به‌علاوه، برای حمایت از پروژه‌های کارآفرینانه در بخش دولتی، ایجاد منابع مالی و تسهیل همکاری میان بخش دولتی و خصوصی می‌تواند به تسریع فرآیندهای نوآورانه کمک کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Application of the Entrepreneurial Government Theory with Emphasis on Issues in Iran

نویسنده [English]

  • Hadi Sanaeepour
. Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Azadshahr Faculty of Humanities, Gonbad Kavous University, Gonbad Kavous, Iran
چکیده [English]

This study examines and analyzes the application of the "Entrepreneurial State" theory in Iran. The main objective of the research is to identify the challenges and opportunities for implementing this theory in the country’s government policies. Using a qualitative research method and content analysis of documents and previous studies, the research investigates the current state of the Entrepreneurial State in Iran and compares it with the successful experiences of other countries. Data collection was conducted through library studies, document analysis, reports, and the examination of international experiences. Content analysis was employed as the method for analyzing the data. The findings indicate that the Entrepreneurial State, as a novel model in public administration, plays an active role in economic development and the support of innovations. In contrast to traditional approaches, which recognize the government merely as a regulatory and supervisory entity, this theory views the government as a facilitator and executor of innovations and economic projects. Examining the experiences of other countries also reveals that adopting the principles of the Entrepreneurial State in policymaking can contribute to improving government efficiency and enhancing economic competitiveness. In Iran, although challenges such as complex bureaucracy, centralization, and cultural resistance to change exist, embracing this model could help improve the performance of public institutions. Proposed solutions include reforming bureaucratic structures, decentralizing decision-making, changing organizational culture to encourage innovation and risk-taking in the public sector, and creating incentive systems for public employees and managers. Furthermore, to support entrepreneurial projects in the public sector, the establishment of financial resources and facilitating cooperation between the public and private sectors can help accelerate innovative processes

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Entrepreneurship
  • Public Administration
  • Entrepreneurial Government
  • New Public Services

Smiley face

- Aghion, P., David, P. A., & Foray, D. (2009). Science, Technology, and Innovation for Economic Growth: Linking Policy Research and Practice. Research Policy, 38(4), 681-693.
Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2017). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 48(3), 475-490.
Andersson, M., & Henrekson, M. (2015). Economic Growth and Innovation Policy in Sweden. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Autio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, P., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2014). Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context. Research Policy, 43(7), 1097-1108.
Bevir, M. (2011). The SAGE handbook of governance. SAGE Publications.
Bernier, L., & Hafsi, T. (2024). Public sector entrepreneurship: An integrative review. Small Business Economics, 63(2), 345-367.
Block, F., & Keller, M. R. (2011). State of Innovation: The U.S. Government’s Role in Technology Development. Routledge.
Block, J., & Sandner, P. (2009). Necessity and opportunity entrepreneurs and their duration in self-employment: Evidence from German micro data. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 9(2), 117-137.
Block, J. H., Fisch, C. O., & van Praag, M. (2018). The Schumpeterian entrepreneur: A review of the empirical evidence on the antecedents, behavior, and consequences of innovative entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 51(1), 23-55.
Borins, S. (2001). Encouraging innovation in the public sector. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(3), 310-319.
Borrás, S., & Edquist, C. (2013). The Choice of Innovation Policy Instruments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(8), 1513-1522.
Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent: Logical foundations of constitutional democracy. University of Michigan Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
Dashti, F., poordanesh, E. S., bagherinia, H., & mokarramipour, M. (2021). Components of Soft Power in the Model of Resistance Economy. State Studies of Contemporary Iran, 7(3), 7-33. [In Persian]
Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2007). The new public service, M.E. Sharpe Publication.
Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2000). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 549-559.
Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2015). Public administration: An action orientation. Cengage Learning.
Drucker, P. F. (1993). Post-capitalist society. HarperBusiness.
Dubnick, M. J. (2014). Accountability and the promise of performance. M.E. Sharpe.
Evans, P. (1995). Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton University Press.
Ferlie, E., Lynn, L. E., & Pollitt, C. (2005). The Oxford handbook of public management. Oxford University Press.
Frederickson, H. G. (1997). The spirit of public administration. Jossey-Bass.
Frederickson, H. G., Smith, K. B., Larimer, C. W., & Licari, M. J. (2018). The public administration theory primer. Routledge.
Grimpe, C., & Kaiser, U. (2010). Balancing internal and external knowledge acquisition: The gains and pains from R&D outsourcing. Journal of Management Studies, 47(8), 1483-1509.
Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3-19.
Keynes, J. M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. Macmillan.
Kearney, C., Hisrich, R. D., & Roche, F. (2009). Public and private sector entrepreneurship: Similarities, differences or a combination? Journal of small business and enterprise development, 16(1), 26-46.
Klein, P. G., Mahoney, J. T., McGahan, A. M., & Pitelis, C. N. (2010). Toward a theory of public entrepreneurship. European Management Review, 7(1), 1-15.
Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications.
Krueger, A. O. (1990). Government failures in development. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4(3), 9-23.
Lazonick, W., & Mazzucato, M. (2013). The risk-reward nexus in the innovation-inequality relationship. Industrial and Corporate Change, 22(4), 1093-1128.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
Lindblom, C. E. (1977). Politics and Markets. Basic Books.
Mazzucato, M. (2013). The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths. Anthem Press.
Mazzucato, M. (2018). The Value of Everything: Making and Taking in the Global Economy. Penguin.
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. Free Press.
Mirinejad, E., Dehghani, M., & Yaghoubi, N. M. (2023). Development of entrepreneurial government and enhancement of organizational capacities in the public sector: An analysis of the drivers of entrepreneurial government in the public sector of Sistan and Baluchestan. Productivity Management, 3(1), 105-127. [In Persian]
Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Harvard University Press.
Morris, M. H., & Jones, F. F. (1999). Entrepreneurship in established organizations: The case of the public sector. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(1), 71-91.
Moslemi mehni, Y., lashkari, Z., karimi zade, M., & nejatpour, M. (2021). Chaebols and Economic Development in South Korea (Case Study: 1960s to 1990s). State Studies of Contemporary Iran, 7(2), 113-137. [In Persian]
Murray, F., & Rhyne, L. (2020). Canada’s Innovation Strategy and Economic Growth. Cambridge University Press.
Naderpour, B., Ranjbar, R., Hoseini-Nia, G., & Houshmandyar, N. (2019). Designing a conceptual model of the entrepreneurial state in Iran using a qualitative meta-analysis approach. Quarterly Journal of Public Organizations Management, 8(1), 1-18. [In Persian]
Nedaee, A. A. (2022). Analyzing Damaging Effect of Iran's Economic Environment on Public Policy-Making. State Studies of Contemporary Iran, 8(1), 165-187. [In Persian]
Nigro, F. A., & Nigro, L. G. (1989). Modern public administration. Harper & Row.
North, D. C. (1991). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press.
Naughton, B. (2018). The Chinese Economy: Adaptation and Growth. MIT Press.
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Addison-Wesley.
Osborne, S. P. (2006). The new public governance? Public Management Review, 8(3), 377-387.
Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (2017). Handbook of public administration. Sage.
Roberts, N. C., & King, P. J. (1991). Policy entrepreneurs: Their activity structure and function in the policy process. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1(2), 147-175.
Rodrik, D. (2004). Industrial Policy for the Twenty-First Century. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 4767.
Rosenbloom, D. H. (2008). Public administration: Understanding management, politics, and law in the public sector. McGraw-Hill.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. Harper & Brothers.
Schneider, P., & Veugelers, R. (2010). On Young Highly Innovative Companies: Why They Matter and How (Not) to Policy Support Them. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(4), 969-1007.
Silverman, D. (2020). Interpreting qualitative data. Sage.
Stiglitz, J. E., & Greenwald, B. (2014). Creating a Learning Society: A New Approach to Growth, Development, and Social Progress. Columbia University Press.
Wong, P. K. (2001). Innovation Policies for the Knowledge-Based Economy: The Singapore Experience. World Scientific.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage Publications
دوره 10، شماره 4
زمستان 1403
اسفند 1403
صفحه 136-111
  • تاریخ دریافت: 11 اسفند 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 17 بهمن 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 20 بهمن 1403
  • تاریخ انتشار: 01 اسفند 1403